Hi Bookfoxers, Here's a tip to make your character seem like a full, complex, robust character. It seems simple but I've found it's not only a great way to craft a character, but also a great litmus check to see whether your character is too 2-dimensional. Here it is: Make sure your character exists in all three temporal dimensions:
This might seem like obvious advice, but the devil is in the details. 1. Haunted by the Past For example, when it comes to the past, most writers believe that means delivering information about the past. So we know that character X:
But that focus on information can lead to dull exposition. No, when I'm talking about the past, I mean to have your character haunted by the past. The past must be a problem for your character. The past must feel unresolved. In Claire Keegan's book, "Small Things like These," we don't get a ton of backstory on the main character, Bill Furlong, but we do know he's unsure of his father's identity, and that bothers him. There's a smattering of information about his past, but the most relevant detail is the mystery of his father. So a chunk of the book is about him trying to discover the identity of his father. When constructing a character's past, follow these guidelines:
2. Wrestling with the Present This seems like the most obvious fodder for narrative, and that's why writers usually get this one right. Conflict, conflict, conflict, all the writing teachers tell us, and you know what? They're right. My biggest recommendation is that you should have at least two problems in the present (at least!). While you can get away with a single issue in the past and a single issue in the future, in the present you should double down. To draw again from Claire Keegan's book, she offers two present-moment problems:
The first is more of an external problem (the mistreated girl). While the other is more of an internal problem (anxiety, fretting). Before we get to our third point, let's have a word from our sponsor:
3. Wary of the Future The future is the time period most ignored when constructing a character. So many writers forget about this part, but I'm sure you won't forget! Ask yourself:
Bill Furlong has five young daughters. A man with five daughters has plenty to worry about. He's worried about them "entering the world of men." Once again, like the past, the future only is relevant in the way that it affects the present. Because Bill is worried about his daughters' future, it makes his present work and decision about the imprisoned girl more difficult. The future creates problems for the present in the same way the past creates problems for the present. Happy writing! John Matthew Fox PS. I've been posting writing videos on my Youtube Channel. Check em out! |
John Matthew Fox helps authors write better fiction. He is the founder of Bookfox, where he creates online courses for writers, provides editing and offers publishing assistance. He is the author of "The Linchpin Writer: Crafting Your Novel's Key Moments" and “I Will Shout Your Name,” a collection of short stories.
Hi Bookfoxers, Rudolf Flesch, an Austrian who hid from the Nazis in WW II, wondered why English sentences were so difficult to read. He thought writing should be simple, but that most people cluttered it up needlessly with complex language. So he gave two pieces of advice: keep your sentences short (he thought the golden mean was 17 words) use short words (longer words decrease comprehension) And Flesch invented a formula that calculated words and syllables in sentences, and assigned a score...
Hi Bookfoxers, When I was 31 years old, I’d been laboring over a novel for 5 years. It was a quagmire. I was stuck in a plot that wouldn’t move, in characters that couldn’t elicit sympathy, and with ambitions that were far beyond my skill as a writer. But here’s the thing: I wasn’t a quitter. I thought that only losers quit. I thought that way, because when I was in high school, I tried out for the JV basketball team both as a freshman and sophomore – and didn’t make the team either year. So...
Hi Bookfoxers, I once had a creative writing professor who would read out loud the first paragraph of any story submitted to the workshop. Reading it out loud was a way not only to test it, but a way to slow down and really focus on the beginning. To see whether it sounded boring, or weird, or just plain dumb. I’m afraid that nearly all of the stories did not pass muster. He would growl through the first paragraph, and sometimes he would ask whether we thought someone would want to: Have a...