profile

Bookfox

What you need to know about Antagonists (before they ruin your book)

Published 2 months ago • 3 min read

Hi Bookfoxers,

Antagonists power your book.

Without an antagonist, you don't have a story and you certainly don't have a novel.

But antagonists don't have to be villains.

A villain is an outright evil character, while an antagonist could be:

  • a friend who turns on the main character
  • an annoying parent
  • even the protagonist! (like Holden Caulfield)

But how likeable should you make your antagonist?

It's perfectly fine to have an antagonist who is 100% evil.

It's also perfectly fine to have an antagonist who has some likable traits:

  • they like puppies
  • they can be kind or generous
  • they're smart and capable

Consider this: if you have an anti-hero, or a deeply flawed protagonist, the antagonist might even be a better, more likable, more relatable human than your protagonist!

The general rule, when you're creating an antagonist, is that the more time we spend with your antagonist, the more likable they should be.

That's because readers grimace at spending long chunks of a book in the presence of pure evil.

If you spend very little time close to the antagonist, neither in their head or in their POV, then go ahead and make them as evil and unlikable as you want!

Here are some examples:

Jose Saramago has a book narrated by the Grim Reaper.

Death does not seem likable.

Yet the Grim Reaper is charming. She's witty. She's funny! (yes, it's a she).

We don't mind spending time with her because she's entertaining and in the end, she's a likable character.

The antagonist in Lord of the Rings is Sauron.

That's a portrait of pure evil, but we're not exactly hanging out with him in the book, so the evil is kept at arm's length.

He's mentioned, at a far remove, but he's not sharing ales at the Prancing Pony with hobbits. The distance helps the reader to accept his pure evil nature.

Or consider Hannibal Lector in The Silence of the Lambs.

We spend quite a lot of time with him, and because of that, he's portrayed as:

  • Polite. He doesn't act like a sociopath.
  • Cultured. He has excellent taste in food and is well educated.
  • Moral Code. He chooses most victims because he considers them evil.

Readers aren't going to follow his lead of pairing a chianti with human liver, but at the same time, they would acknowledge he's a charming antagonist.

I have four more tips to write antagonists, but first, a word from our sponsor:

Sponsored by Premium Ghostwriting Academy

Build An Audience By Writing Online

Fiction Writers:

  • Tired of your writing getting zero attention?
  • Looking to build an audience to promote your work (and land a book deal)?
  • Want to position yourself as a writer with authority (even if you’re a beginner)?

Then look no further! This FREE email course will help you:

  • Craft irresistible headlines to hook attention
  • Generate endless writing ideas in 30 minutes
  • Write in a niche you own (and differentiate yourself as a writer)

Click here to get instant access.

Here are four more tips about antagonists:

1. Don't forget your antagonist's backstory.

Often, backstory is one of the main ways that antagonists become more relatable, because we don't see them in a vacuum.

Their backstory often explains their motivations in a way that makes us sympathize with them.

2. What your antagonist wants must be directly opposed to what your protagonist wants.

If their desires aren't butting heads, then you don't have an antagonist, you have a minor character.

For instance, in the television show 1923, we see Harrison Ford's character wants to keep his ranch "The Yellowstone," and the antagonist wants to seize it for himself.

They both can't get what they want.

3. Antagonists can change and become allies.

Mr. Darcy, in Pride and Prejudice, is certainly the antagonist. He's arrogant and cheated someone out of an inheritance.

But he also ends up saving the family's good name by paying off Wickham.

In the end, Mr. Darcy changes into a suitable suitor. This type of change is the core narrative principle of the genre of "enemies to lovers."

4. It's possible to have multiple antagonists.

The danger of having multiple antagonists is that it can make the story seem scattered. Defeating one antagonist might be anticlimactic if there's another one out there.

But many stories do it well.

It's best to have each antagonist oppose the protagonist in different ways -- one antagonist for the main plot, and one antagonist for the subplot.

Happy Writing!

John Matthew Fox of Bookfox

PS. If you ever want to share these emails, or look at past emails, go here.

Bookfox

John Matthew Fox helps authors write better fiction. He is the founder of Bookfox, where he creates online courses for writers, provides editing and offers publishing assistance. He is the author of "The Linchpin Writer: Crafting Your Novel's Key Moments" and “I Will Shout Your Name,” a collection of short stories.

Read more from Bookfox

Hi Bookfoxers, Today we're answering this reader question: I am writing a fictionalized version of my maternal grandmother's life in her voice, based on dramatic stories my grandmother told me over the years. I am embellishing some of the stories, and keeping them intact in others. But at this point, they seem like vignettes that I'm not sure how to tie them together. I keep thinking I need, "a clothesline to hang them on". I've thought of interjecting myself, using my memories to tie them...

9 days ago • 3 min read

Hi Bookfoxers, I'm continuing to answer readers' questions, this time from someone who will stay anonymous, in case their neighbor reads this newsletter as well: Despite holding an MFA from a prestigious university and a recent acceptance for traditional publication for my second novel, I still have what is referred to as "imposter syndrome." I knew it was present, perhaps beneath the surface, but what drove it home was when a neighbor asked me to review his manuscript. He planned on...

23 days ago • 4 min read

Hi Bookfoxers, I've started to answer questions from readers in this newsletter, and this one comes from Brenna Labine: Any advice on toeing the line between too much visual description and the right amount of scene/character description? Great question, Brenna! Your question is really a question of pacing -- how can writers keep the reader's interest while simultaneously fully fleshing out the world of the book? If you don't give enough description, the reader won't be immersed. While if you...

29 days ago • 5 min read
Share this post