Hi Bookfoxers,
I have zero desire to have a computer write for me.
There.
I said it.
But there are lots of writers who feel differently. And soon, their books are going to be flooding the marketplace.
Some books will say "AI Assisted" in the front notes, while others will try to hide the fact that ChatGPT wrote some of their book.
But that's only the start.
We writers have to face the fact that in 5 or 10 years, AI programs will be able to write an entire book.
Will it be good? Well, not exactly.
Humans will still be tweaking and rewriting parts.
But it will be readable. And if readers buy it, that means one less buyer of a human-written novel.
How will we compete against an author who "writes" a book every two weeks, collaborating with AI intelligence to churn out sequels?
Well, there is a solution. (I'll talk about that in a bit).
But let's address an even bigger problem: plenty of writers who are writing now, without the help of AI programs, are trying to write like machines.
That's because currently, there is a large segment of the writing industry that teaches writers to write like a machine.
Save the Cat is a premier example of this. They give you a formula.
And there are plenty of other books out there that give you very strict, detailed instructions on how to construct a book "by the rules."
But when AI starts writing novels, guess how they're going to structure them? By following those formulas to a T.
So if you're a lover of formulas, you're about to get eclipsed by a machine.
You're basically like a factory worker at the dawn of the industrial age, about to be made obsolete by new technology.
So what's a writer to do?
What was the solution I alluded to above?
Here it is:
Start writing more humanly.
What does it look like to write more like a human and less like a machine?
Here are six important techniques:
There's one final trick to defeating AI writing programs:
Being more of a human.
Ultimately, writing is a connection from human soul to human soul.
You probably like my emails (you like my emails, don't you?) because I'm vulnerable and I bare my brain and I'm as honest as possible.
You know me, in a way.
And that's because writing is about a relationship. It's not very satisfying to have a relationship with a machine or to read a book by one.
An AI program can't:
If we work on being more human in our writing and in our lives, then we have a shot against the machines.
Writing like a human,
John Matthew Fox
PS. No, I didn't use an AI program to write any part of this. :)
PPS. Visit Bookfox to get inspired by my non-formulaic writing courses or to get help with book editing (from a human).
John Matthew Fox helps authors write better fiction. He is the founder of Bookfox, where he creates online courses for writers, provides editing and offers publishing assistance. He is the author of "The Linchpin Writer: Crafting Your Novel's Key Moments" and “I Will Shout Your Name,” a collection of short stories.
Hi Bookfoxers, Rudolf Flesch, an Austrian who hid from the Nazis in WW II, wondered why English sentences were so difficult to read. He thought writing should be simple, but that most people cluttered it up needlessly with complex language. So he gave two pieces of advice: keep your sentences short (he thought the golden mean was 17 words) use short words (longer words decrease comprehension) And Flesch invented a formula that calculated words and syllables in sentences, and assigned a score...
Hi Bookfoxers, When I was 31 years old, I’d been laboring over a novel for 5 years. It was a quagmire. I was stuck in a plot that wouldn’t move, in characters that couldn’t elicit sympathy, and with ambitions that were far beyond my skill as a writer. But here’s the thing: I wasn’t a quitter. I thought that only losers quit. I thought that way, because when I was in high school, I tried out for the JV basketball team both as a freshman and sophomore – and didn’t make the team either year. So...
Hi Bookfoxers, I once had a creative writing professor who would read out loud the first paragraph of any story submitted to the workshop. Reading it out loud was a way not only to test it, but a way to slow down and really focus on the beginning. To see whether it sounded boring, or weird, or just plain dumb. I’m afraid that nearly all of the stories did not pass muster. He would growl through the first paragraph, and sometimes he would ask whether we thought someone would want to: Have a...